Federico Gaio vs Andreas Vinciguerra Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
W L L W L L W L W LHead To Head: Gaio 1 - 0 Vinciguerra
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gaio winning 2 and Vinciguerra winning 1. The last match between Gaio and Vinciguerra was at the Italy F10, 27-05-2013, First, Clay with Federico Gaio getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Gaio | 1 |
| Andreas Vinciguerra | 0 |
Italy F10(27-05-2013)
3
6
6
3
6
4
| Gaio | Stats | Vinciguerra |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 741 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 79 |
| 33 | Age | 44 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 13 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (526-439) | Career Total W/L | 55% (219-176) |
| $392,005 | Career Prize Money | $53,525 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gaio VS Vinciguerra H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Gaio VS Vinciguerra H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Federico Gaio
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gabriele Bosio
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
88%
(
53 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gianluca Carlini
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Gaio
44%
(
40 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Filippo Romano
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alessandro Dragoni
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andreas Vinciguerra Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fernando Verdasco
Player
Andreas Vinciguerra
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Vinciguerra
Player
Enrico Becuzzi
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Igor Andreev
Player
Andreas Vinciguerra
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Ward
Player
Andreas Vinciguerra
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrej Martin
Player
Andreas Vinciguerra
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Vinciguerra
Player
Nicolas Massu
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
10
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (526/439) | Win/Loss | 55% (219/176) |
| 53% (1205/1068) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (514/431) |
| 51% (11068/10593) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4600/4276) |
| 55% (136/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (33/36) |
| 57% (334/256) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (104/84) |
| 45% (51/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (80/51) |
| 36% (5/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 3004 | Aces Total | 272 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 2390 | Total Double Faults | 149 |
| 1:9:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 556.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 490.98 |
| 58% (27135/47153) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2656/4204) |
| 71% (19324/27135) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1854/2656) |
| 51% (10139/20018) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (756/1548) |
| 39% (1750/4458) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (134/296) |
| 38% (18415/48497) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1478/4125) |
| 32% (12/26) | Slam W/L | 50% (15/15) |
| 23% (3/10) | Masters W/L | 45% (13/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 22% (4/14) |
| 40% (21/31) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (77/70) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (270/257) | Challenger W/L | 64% (98/55) |
| 66% (220/115) | Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) |
| 54% (515/949) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (203/353) |
| 67% (6/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (14/38) |
| 46% (141/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (63/133) |
| 54% (183/340) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (55/108) |
| 85% (511/435) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (224/184) |
| 15% (511/76) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (224/38) |
| 20% (454/90) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (171/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
